<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>e-LEGAL | Gathering</title>
		<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/</link>
		<description>A Private Investigator discussion forum for Private investigators, lawyers and the public</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 00:40:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Stobart Barristers: did the legal earth just get flatter?</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5778&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Legal services liberalisation has been a phoney war, but I think that ends with today’s news that logistics company Stobart Group is entering the...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Legal services liberalisation has been a phoney war, but I think that ends with today’s news that logistics company Stobart Group is entering the market with the launch of Stobart Barristers. For sections of the bar, it makes the ProcureCo model look like Betamax to the green and yellow giant’s VHS.  <br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/blogs/blogs/in-business-blog/stobart-barristers-did-legal-earth-just-get-flatter" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/blogs/blogs/in-business-blog/stobart-barristers-did-legal-earth-just-get-flatter" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5778</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Government moves to adopt deferred prosecutions</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5777&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Long-expected plans to enable US-style deferred prosecutions for white-collar crimes take a step forward with the publication of a Ministry of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Long-expected plans to enable US-style deferred prosecutions for white-collar crimes take a step forward with the publication of a Ministry of Justice consultation today. <br />
Under a deferred prosecution the authorities and a malefactor business can agree a penalty to be imposed if the business does not comply with 'good behaviour' measures over a set period of time. The previous director of the Serious Fraud Office, Richard Alderman, had called for their adoption to curb corporate crime in the UK.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/government-moves-adopt-deferred-prosecutions" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/government-moves-adopt-deferred-prosecutions" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5777</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stobart offers pay-as-you-go barristers - but no plans to be ABS</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5776&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The logistics company known for its distinctive Eddie Stobart lorries has launched a legal service to help the public cut the cost of legal disputes...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>The logistics company known for its distinctive Eddie Stobart lorries has launched a legal service to help the public cut the cost of legal disputes by linking clients directly with barristers without the need for a solicitor.<br />
Stobart Barristers, part of the Stobart Group, says it has a panel of over 1,000 barristers, juniors and QCs, across the UK offering businesses and individuals help in all areas of law. It provides a fixed-fee service, through a ‘pay-as-you-go’ model during the litigation process, giving the client control of the process and enabling them to end it after each stage.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/stobart-offers-pay-you-go-barristers-no-plans-be-abs" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/stobart-offers-pay-you-go-barristers-no-plans-be-abs" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5776</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Legal walk lineup</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5775&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>West London firm Lovell Chohan says it is leading the fundraising league table of 408 teams taking part in next Monday’s London Legal Walk. The firm...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>West London firm Lovell Chohan says it is leading the fundraising league table of 408 teams taking part in next Monday’s London Legal Walk. The firm has already raised £6,000 for the London Legal Support Trust and aims to reach £7,500 by the end of the event, solicitors clerk Chris Shearwood said. Some 5,000 legal figures, including the lord chief justice and master of the rolls, are expected to take part in the 10km walk around London legal landmarks. See tinyurl.com/bwbc6d5.<br />
<b>Early plea extension</b><br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/news-in-brief/legal-walk-lineup" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/news-in-brief/legal-walk-lineup" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5775</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CoA judge raps defendant for spurning mediation</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5774&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:48:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A Court of Appeal judge has criticised a defendant for rejecting mediation offered at a previous hearing - warning it will be a costly decision....</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>A Court of Appeal judge has criticised a defendant for rejecting mediation offered at a previous hearing - warning it will be a costly decision.<br />
Lord Justice Longmore said it was a ‘great pity’ that appliance supplier Indesit, instructed by Plexus Solicitors, had not pursued the option of mediation as advised by Lord Justice Toulson in a personal injury case. Indesit had successfully defended a personal injury claim by employee Ali Ghaith, but Ghaith was subsequently given permission to appeal. <br />
It was then that the appeal judge encouraged Indesit to pursue the option of mediation.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/coa-judge-raps-defendant-spurning-mediation" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/coa-judge-raps-defendant-spurning-mediation" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5774</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>British hacker jailed for one year for breaking into Facebook account</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5773&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:34:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[---Quote (Originally by [URL="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/author/gcluley/")--- 
Graham Cluley[/URL]]Southwark Crown Court has sentenced a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div><!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote_printable -->
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<div>
				Originally Posted by <strong>[URL=&quot;http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/author/gcluley/&quot;</strong>
				
			</div>
			<div class="message">Graham Cluley[/URL]]<font color="#333333"><span style="font-family: arial">Southwark Crown Court has sentenced a 21-year-old British man to a jail in prison after he admitted hacking into the Facebook account of a US citizen, and accessing private messages.</span></font><br />
<font color="#333333"><span style="font-family: arial">Gareth Crosskey, of the village of Sompting, near Lancing, in West Sussex, was jailed yesterday after admitting he had hacked into a private Facebook account.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://sophosnews.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/scotland-yard-500.jpg?w=640" border="0" alt="" /><br />
<br />
The hack was initially reported to the FBI, who traced the source of the unauthorised access to the UK. The Metropolitan Police Service's Police Central e-Crime Unit (PCeU) arrested Crosskey in July last year, and took away from his home computers and other storage devices for analysis.<br />
Crosskey was subsequently charged with two offenses under the Computer Misuse Act<br />
A <a href="http://content.met.police.uk/News/Man-jailed-for-hacking-Facebook-account/1400008604027/1257246745756" target="_blank">statement</a>  issued by the PCeU underlined their hope that the jail sentence would act as a warning to others that Facebook hacking is an offence that will be taken seriously by the authorities:<br />
<div style="margin-left:40px">&quot;The PCeU are working to detect and bring before the courts those responsible for this type of offence. Today's result should act as a deterrent to any individuals thinking of participating in this type of criminal activity.&quot;</div></span></font></div>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>
<!-- END TEMPLATE: bbcode_quote_printable --><a href="https://twitter.com/intent/follow?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fnakedsecurity.sophos.com%2F2012%2F05%2F17%2Fbritish-hacker-jailed-facebook-account%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dgcluley%26utm_campaign%3Dnaked%2Bsecurity&amp;region=follow_link&amp;screen_name=gcluley&amp;source=followbutton&amp;variant=2.0" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/intent/follow?or...on&amp;variant=2.0</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=18">Other Law</category>
			<dc:creator>PI Guy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5773</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Contract</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5772&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Intention to create legal relationship - Formation of contract - Whether court erring 
*Barbudev v Eurocom Cable Management Bulgaria EOOD and others:...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Intention to create legal relationship - Formation of contract - Whether court erring<br />
<b>Barbudev v Eurocom Cable Management Bulgaria EOOD and others: Court of Appeal, Civil Division (Sir Anthony May P, Lord Justices Lloyd Aikens): 27 April 2012</b><br />
The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal, held that, in the context of a sale of a television and internet cable company in Bulgaria, a side letter addressed to the claimant did not constitute a legally enforceable contract, but was an agreement to agree. <br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/contract-21" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/contract-21" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5772</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Company</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5771&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Unfair prejudice to members - Relief 
*Re Home & Office Fire Extinguishers Ltd Rodliffe v Rodliffe and another: Chancery Division, Companies Court...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Unfair prejudice to members - Relief<br />
<b>Re Home &amp; Office Fire Extinguishers Ltd Rodliffe v Rodliffe and another: Chancery Division, Companies Court (Mr N Strauss QC): 4 April 2012</b><br />
The Companies Court ordered the first defendant to sell his shares to his claimant brother under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 following a falling out between them.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/company-17" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/company-17" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5771</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Judicial review</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5770&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Evidence - Claimants seeking judicial review of decisions of defendant secretary of state refusing to grant naturalisation 
*R (on the application of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Evidence - Claimants seeking judicial review of decisions of defendant secretary of state refusing to grant naturalisation<br />
<b>R (on the application of AHK and *others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: QBD (Admin) (Mr Justice Ouseley): 2 May 2012</b><br />
There were more than 40 cases before the Administrative Court in which claimants were seeking judicial review of the decisions of the defendant secretary of state refusing to grant them naturalisation as British citizens under section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/judicial-review-3" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/judicial-review-3" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5770</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Constitutional law</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5769&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Diplomatic privilege - Immunity from legal process - Domestic servants 
*Wokuri v Kassam: ChD (Mr Justice Newey): 30 January 2012* 
The claimant...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Diplomatic privilege - Immunity from legal process - Domestic servants<br />
<b>Wokuri v Kassam: ChD (Mr Justice Newey): 30 January 2012</b><br />
The claimant worked as a chef and general domestic servant for the defendant in Uganda under a contract (the 1998 contract). The claimant subsequently performed work for the defendant in the UK.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/constitutional-law" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/constitutional-law" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Privilege</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5768&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Disclosure and inspection of documents - Legal professional privilege - Communications between legal adviser and client 
*Walter Lilly & Co Ltd v...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Disclosure and inspection of documents - Legal professional privilege - Communications between legal adviser and client<br />
<b>Walter Lilly &amp; Co Ltd v Mackay and another: QBD (TCC) (Mr Justice Akenhead): 15 March 2012</b><br />
In 2004, the claimant company was employed by the second defendant company to construct a house in London. Owing to delays, the couple who were to be the owners and occupiers of the house (Mr and Mrs M) became disillusioned with the claimant and in October 2006 retained the services of a firm of claims consultants, K. <br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/privilege-3" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/privilege-3" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5768</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Copyright</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5767&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Infringement - Artistic work - Claim arising from use of peer-to-peer file-sharing website to download music 
*Dramatico Entertainment Ltd and other...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Infringement - Artistic work - Claim arising from use of peer-to-peer file-sharing website to download music<br />
<b>Dramatico Entertainment Ltd and other companies v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and other *companies: ChD (Mr Justice Arnold): 2 May 2012</b><br />
The claimants were record companies claiming on their own behalf and in a representative capacity on behalf of other members of BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd and Phonographic Performance Ltd. <br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/copyright-2" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/inpractice/lawreports/copyright-2" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5767</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ALS interpreters contract facing renewed scrutiny</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5766&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>The deal between the Ministry of Justice and the private company contracted to provide court interpreters is to face scrutiny from parliamentary...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>The deal between the Ministry of Justice and the private company contracted to provide court interpreters is to face scrutiny from parliamentary watchdogs, as cases continue to be disrupted by poor performance and non-attendance of interpreters.<br />
Public spending watchdog the National Audit Office told the <i>Gazette</i> that it has received ‘a number of representations’ about the Applied Language Solutions contract from parties including members of the Commons Public Accounts Committee, and said it is ‘considering the matter’.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/als-interpreters-contract-facing-renewed-scrutiny" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/als-interpreters-contract-facing-renewed-scrutiny" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5766</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Sky targets new court filming rights</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5765&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>A TV executive campaigning to lift the ban on cameras in criminal courts has said the limited rights announced in last week’s Queen’s speech will not...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>A TV executive campaigning to lift the ban on cameras in criminal courts has said the limited rights announced in last week’s Queen’s speech will not end the battle for access. ‘We’re obviously interested in discussing what extras we can do down the road,’ Simon Bucks, associate editor at Sky News and a prominent campaigner for a change in the law, told the <i>Gazette</i>. <br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/sky-targets-new-court-filming-rights" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/sky-targets-new-court-filming-rights" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5765</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ABS applicants billed thousands for consultancy</title>
			<link>http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5764&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 10:32:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Alternative business structure hopefuls are being invoiced thousands of pounds for consultants to handle the financial minutiae of their applications...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->
<div>Alternative business structure hopefuls are being invoiced thousands of pounds for consultants to handle the financial minutiae of their applications to the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the <i>Gazette</i> has learned.<br />
The SRA says it has hired spe******ts to supplement its 25-strong team dedicated to vetting ABS applications. Last month it was revealed that consultants had been drafted in to deal with foreign organisations - it has now emerged that similar arrangements are in place for applications involving private equity.<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/firms-charged-over-abs-consultancy" target="_blank">read more</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/firms-charged-over-abs-consultancy" target="_blank">More...</a></div>


<!-- END TEMPLATE: postbit_external -->]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=54">Law News</category>
			<dc:creator>Law Tweets</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.e-legal-gathering.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=5764</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

